Home > HSRP Hotspot

HSRP Hotspot

March 8th, 2011 in Hotspot Go to comments

Question:

HSRP_Hotspot

- DSW1( Distribute switch 1) is the primary device for Vlan 101, 102, 105
– DSW2 ( Distribute switch 2) is the primary device for Vlan 103 and 104


Question 1:


During routine maintenance, it became necessary to shutdown G1/0/1 on DSW1. All other interface were up. During this time, DSW1 remained the active device for Vlan 102′s HSRP group. You have determined that there is an issue with the decrement value in the track command in Vlan 102′s HSRP group. What need to be done to make the group function properly?

A. The DSW1′s decrement value should be configured with a value from 5 to 15
B. The DSW1′s decrement value should be configured with a value from 9 to 15
C. The DSW1′s decrement value should be configured with a value from 11 to 18
D. The DSW1′s decrement value should be configured with a value from 195 to less than 205
E. The DSW1′s decrement value should be configured with a value from 200 to less than 205
F. The DSW1′s decrement value should be greater than 190 and less 200


Answer: C

Explanation:

The question clearly stated that there was an issue with the decrement value in VLAN 102 so we should check VLAN 102 on both DSW1 and DSW2 switches first. Click on the PC Console1 and PC Console2 to access these switches then use the “show running-config” command on both switches

DSW1>enable
DSW1#show running-config

DSW2>enable
DSW2#show running-config

HSRP_show_run

As shown in the outputs, the DSW1′s priority is 200 and is higher than that of DSW2 so DSW1 becomes active switch for the group. Notice that the interface Gig1/0/1 on DSW1 is being tracked so when this interface goes down, HSRP automatically reduces the router’s priority by a configurable amount, in this case 5. Therefore the priority of DSW1 goes down from 200 to 195. But this value is still higher than that of DSW2 (190) so DSW1 remains the active switch for the group. To make DSW2 takes over this role, we have to configure DSW1′s decrement value with a value equal or greater than 11 so that its result is smaller than that of DSW2 (200 – 11 < 190). Therefore C is the correct answer.

Question 2:

During routine maintenance, G1/0/1 on DSW1 was shutdown. All other interface were up. DSW2 became the active HSRP device for Vlan101 as desired. However, after G1/0/1 on DSW1 was reactivated. DSW1 did not become the active HSRP device as desired. What need to be done to make the group for Vlan101 function properly?

A. Enable preempt on DSW1′s Vlan101 HSRP group
B. Disable preempt on DSW1′s Vlan101 HSRP group
C. Decrease DSW1′s priority value for Vlan101 HSRP group to a value that is less than priority value configured on DSW2′s HSRP group for Vlan101
D. Decrease the decrement in the track command for DSW1′s Vlan 101 HSRP group to a value less than the value in the track command for DSW2′s Vlan 101 HSRP group.


Answer: A

Explanation:

Continue to check VLAN 101 on both switches…

HSRP_show_run_2.jpg

We learned that DSW1 doesn’t have the “standby 1 preempt” command so it can’t take over the active role again even if its priority is the highest. So we need to enable this command on VLAN 101 of DSW1.

Question 3:

DSW2 has not become the active device for Vlan103′s HSRP group even though all interfaces are active. As related to Vlan103′s HSRP group. What can be done to make the group function properly?

A. On DSW1, disable preempt
B. On DSW1, decrease the priority value to a value less than 190 and greater than 150
C. On DSW2, increase the priority value to a value greater 241 and less than 249
D. On DSW2, increase the decrement value in the track command to a value greater than 10 and less than 50.


Answer: B or C

Explanation:

HSRP_vlan103

The reason DSW2 has not become the active switch for Vlan103 is because the priority value of DSW1 is higher than that of DSW2. In order to make DSW2 become the active switch, we need to increase DSW2′s priority (to higher than 200) or decrease DSW1′s priority (to lower than 190).

Question 4:

If G1/0/1 on DSW1 is shutdown, what will be the current priority value of the Vlan105′s group on DSW1?

A. 95
B. 100
C. 150
D. 200


Answer: A

Explanation:

Below is the output of VLAN 105:

HSRP_vlan105.jpg

If G1/0/1 on DSW1 is shutdown, its priority will decrease 55 so, its value will be 150 – 55 = 95

Question 5:

What is the configured priority value of the Vlan105′s group on DSW2 ?

A. 50
B. 100
C. 150
D. 200


Answer: B

Explanation:

Below is the output of VLAN 105 of DSW2:

HSRP_vlan105_DSW2.jpg

We don’t see the priority of DSW2 so it is using the default value (100).

Question 6:

During routine maintenance, it became necessary to shutdown G1/0/1 on DSW1 and DSW2. All other interface were up. During this time, DSW1 became the active device for Vlan104′s HSRP group. As related to Vlan104′s HSRP group, what can be done to make the group function properly?

A. On DSW1, disable preempt
B. On DSW2, decrease the priority value to a value less than 150
C. On DSW1, increase the decrement value in the track command to a value greater than 6
D. On DSW1, disable track command.


Answer: C

Explanation:

HSRP_vlan104

The question asks us how to keep the active role of DSW2. From the outputs, we learned that if both interfaces G1/0/1 of DSW1 and DSW2 are shutdown, the priority of DSW1 will be 150 – 1 = 149 and that of DSW2 will be 200 – 55 = 145 -> DSW1 will become the active switch.

The main point here is that we have to configure so in such a way that when both interfaces G1/0/1 of DSW1 and DSW2 are shutdown, the priority of DSW2 is still greater than that of DSW1. Therefore the priority value of DSW1 should be smaller than 145, or we have to configure the decrement value of DSW1 to a value greater than 6 ( 6 = 150 – 144) -> C is the correct answer.

Notice: To keep the active role of DSW2, we can disable “preempt” on DSW1 (answer A) so that it will not take over the active role when DSW1 is downed but it also means that VLAN 104 will not have active switch -> VLAN104 will fail.

Comments
Comment pages
1 2 30
  1. Anonymous
    October 17th, 2011
  2. Anonymous
    October 20th, 2011

    this hotspot is still in the actuall right? or the STP hotspot?

  3. Sean
    October 24th, 2011

    Can anyone who has taken this test recently provide insight on Question 3? A number of people have discussed it with varying answers. What are we actually seeing on the test?

    Should it be “increase DSW2 value greater than 241 and less than 249″ or “decrease DSW1 value less than 190 and greater than 150?”

  4. AMPdeck
    October 24th, 2011

    Passed this afternoon with 956/1000

    I had this HSRP exam because Q1 and Q3 has been revised.

  5. swccnp
    November 1st, 2011

    are the simulations on this site still valid for switch certification exam ? can someone please suggest where can i find the latest dumps. in case if anyone has the latest pass4sure or valid dumps please send email to swccnp@gmail.com. thanks in advance.

  6. les
    November 11th, 2011

    C is wrong for q 3 as the config would work but if the interface failed then it would still have a higher priority than dsw1. it would have to be 239 or below.

  7. les
    November 12th, 2011

    ignore that read it wrong first mistake of exams read through the question!!

  8. Bo Selecta
    November 13th, 2011

    Hi, for those who have taken the exam, are these actual read-only simulators? Like in the CCNA? Its just that people are referring to it as a SIM.

    Cheers

  9. Navaveli
    November 15th, 2011

    Ans to Q3 is C… As the question states it wants the group to function correctly so if the prior is set to 241 and less to 249 if the interface fails prior goes below 200 thus allows DS1 to take over as primary. Now lets say that Gi1/1 also goes down on DS1 as well then you would want to DS2 become primary as both switches now have interfaces down and gi1/0/2 are the only up interfaces on both switches in this case DS1 will drop to 190 and if DS2 is set 241 it would go down low as 191 making DS2 the primary in case both switches gi1/0/1 are down.

  10. anonymous2
    November 29th, 2011

    @anonymous who posted this link, it seems very helpful. Thank you. http://www.4shared.com/file/YUjhbwiu/CiscoActualTests642-813v76byno.html

    I have a problem with one of the questions though. In the etherchannel section there is a question with a show etherchannel summary output. It looks like the answer is wrong. Please correct me if I am wrong but it looks like it should be A and E, not A and D. D says that Port Channels 1 and 2 are providing two 400mbps etherchannels. I don’t see how that is possible with two FE(100mb) ports.

    anyone else see that?

  11. hussein
    December 13th, 2011

    @anonymous2
    don’t forget that its full duplex, means 100 transmit and 100 receive.

  12. anonymous2
    December 13th, 2011
  13. Osman
    December 25th, 2011

    I think the answer for (question 3 is ans:- C) i know “ans B” is correct but the question asked as
    (DSW2 has not become the active device for Vlan103′s HSRP group even though all interfaces are active.)
    So they mean we should not change any config’s about DSW1 we should change it in DSW2 itself so ans c is correct.

  14. mopedka
    January 9th, 2012

    why is nobody questioning first question? how answer with text “should be changed from 11 to 18″ can be true if there is no decrement “11″ configured? the configured decrement ir 5, so imho answer A should be right one…

  15. Rhebu
    January 11th, 2012

    @mopedka:
    If A is selected to Q1, then the requirement isn’t met. Suppose that one value ranging from 5 to 15 is selected, and that one is 5 (as in excerpt ). DSW1 remains the Active router, and the goal isn’t achieved.

Comment pages
1 2 30
  1. No trackbacks yet.
Add a Comment